This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Smith, M.J. Articles by Cornell, J.E. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Support for Social Health Insurance in South Africa

M.J. Smith, Strategy and Tactics, Churchaven, Alderminster, Stratford Upon Avon, CV37 8NX. E-mail: msmith01{at}iafrica.com

G.C. Solanki

Solanki is at Fifth Quadrant, Private Bag X2, Waterfront, Cape Town, 8000, South Africa. E-mail: Geetesh.Solanki{at}FifthQuadrant.co.za

R. Lalloo

Lalloo is at the Department of Community Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Limpopo, PO Box D20, Medunsa, 0204, South Africa. E-mail: Ratilal.Lalloo{at}ul.ac.za

N.G. Myburgh

N.G. Myburgh is at the Department of Community Oral Health, Faculty of Dentistry and WHO Collaborating Centre, University of the Western Cape, Private Bag X1, Tygerberg, 7505, South Africa. E-mail: nmyburgh{at}uwc.ac.za

J.E. Cornell

J.E. Cornell is at 21 Ladies Mile Extension, Constantia, Cape Town 7800, South Africa. E-mail: judcornell{at}yahoo.co.uk

A national cross-sectional survey was carried out in South Africa to gain an understanding of the perceptions and priorities of the likely members of a future social health insurance (SHI). More than 1,000 employees were interviewed in a variety of employment sectors, including state and parastatal organisations, formal and informal private sectors. This article reports on respondents’ level of support for a compulsory contribution towards a hospital insurance scheme funding care at public sector hospitals in South Africa.

The results showed that only 11 per cent of employees supported an SHI scheme if public hospitals remain as they are. Support increased to 53 per cent if preferential access to treatment was offered to those contributing to the scheme. Support was almost unanimous (87 per cent) if public hospitals were improved. The levels of support differed by current type of health insurance.

Thus, support for a compulsory SHI tax to fund care in public hospitals was conditional upon either improving the hospitals or providing differential treatment to contributing members. If one or both of these conditions are not met, its long-term success will be compromised.

Journal of Health Management, Vol. 10, No. 1, 1-8 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/097206340701000101


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?