Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Health Management
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bradbury, J.
Right arrow Articles by Clark, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

The Millennium Development Goalposts

Researching the Score on and off the Field

Jill Bradbury

Jude Clark

School of Psychology, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Howard College Campus, King George V Ave, Durban 4001. Email: Bradbury{at}ukzn.ac.za; Clarkj1{at}ukzn.ac.za

The United Nations’ Millenium Development Goals (MDGs) work in pervasive and powerful ways in the international imagination, by naturalising a strategic set of goals, indicators and targets, and in doing so, either opening up, or precluding and prescribing particular possibilities for understanding the state of the world and people's experiences. Our departure point for exploring the need for alternative research routes is therefore an engagement with the conceptualisation of ‘development’, the hopeful product of the 2015 target. This conceptual critique is three-fold: 1. There is a slippage in the discourse of the MDGs between ‘poverty’, ‘health’ and ‘development’ and consequently, the relations between different goals are poorly theorised. 2. There is an absence (or extreme paucity) of structural analysis. 3. While people are surely the centre of the developmental goals, in their formulation there is a remarkable absence both of specific groups of people and any conceptualisation of personhood in a more universal human sense. An alternative framework for understanding development and the relations between structure and agency is explored by theorising the themes of gender, national identity and childhood/youth. We then suggest that narrative methodologies may offer a productive research trajectory.

Journal of Health Management, Vol. 11, No. 2, 391-404 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/097206340901100208


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?